.
VR
ThothLestat's Journal


ThothLestat's Journal

THIS JOURNAL IS ON 137 FAVORITE JOURNAL LISTS

Honor: 0    [ Give / Take ]

PROFILE




6 entries this month
 

ONE

22:44 Feb 28 2010
Times Read: 913


you have found a bat.



Heeeeeeeyyyy... my first one!

*smacks forehead*

COMMENTS

-



BLOODLIFE
BLOODLIFE
22:47 Feb 28 2010

Seek them out at night ;-)





Theban
Theban
11:41 Mar 03 2010

I have a cricket bat...not quiet the same though!





ThothLestat
ThothLestat
18:26 Mar 03 2010

I have three baseball bats.. I'll trade you! I always wanted a cricket bat.





 

*KACK*

15:18 Feb 28 2010
Times Read: 924


I'm watching a documentary about Praying Mantises on The Discovery Channel. And while the docu has shown mantises eating all sorts of other insects (and each other) as well as being eaten by lizards and hedgehogs, they would not show film footage of a mantis eating a hummingbird.



I never knew a mantis could move fast enough or get large enough to eat a hummingbird. But they managed to get footage of a hummingbird getting caught by the insect. And then they panned the camera downward to show feathers falling to the forest floor.



It's a curious form of self-censorship, especially coming from The Discovery Channel. Other progams on TDC show cheatahs catching and devouring their prey, or killer whales cathcing and eating seals... spiders eating wasps... etc.



but...



Why wouldn't they show a mantis eating a bird? The voice-over said something like "Hummingbirds are revered for their beautiful colors... it's tempting to condemn the mantis for choosing them as prey..."



The Discovery Channel has the footage, they set up the dramatic scene... and then, don't deliver the goods. WTF?



So yeah, I WANT to see a preying mantis eating a bird. Is that so wrong???



*sips coffee*


COMMENTS

-



xToxicTemptressx
xToxicTemptressx
16:02 Feb 28 2010

lol great sunday viewing huh ;)





Morrigon
Morrigon
16:30 Feb 28 2010

It's about ratings. Meerkat Manor? WTF?! These are little animals and you're trying to make a reality show out of them.



I've been really disappointed in Discovery Channel and other programs as well. It seems like they've lost faith in the ability of nature to inspire and amaze us just on its own.

I really don't think that people need to be spoon fed this shit.





Joli
Joli
03:24 Mar 05 2010

Did you see that you went from "praying" to "preying?" curiouser and curioser





ThothLestat
ThothLestat
21:01 Mar 05 2010

hmmm, so I did.

I must remember NOT to blog on an empty stomach.





 

NEUROTIC?

17:00 Feb 26 2010
Times Read: 958


NEUROTIC KILLER WHALES.



It's comical, in a dark and morbid way, to see journalists and experts furrowing their collective brows while searching deeply for a satisfactory reason to explain the deadly actions of a KILLER WHALE.



For example:

---- snip ----

From CNN: In 1999, Tilikum was blamed for the death of a 27-year-old man whose body was found floating on his back in a tank at SeaWorld, the apparent victim of a whale's "horseplay," authorities said then.

---- snip ----



I don't entirely blame the journalists for adding this detail, but it seems like they're building a case that Tilikum is a crazed serial killer. No doubt, these animals are dangerous. We knew that already. This is a bizarre part of the animal's history, but it's meant to draw you in.



To be fair, the man hid in the park until it was closed for the night. Then climbed into the tank with the killer whale. A 12,000 pound killer whale. The result seems obvious to me.



Swimming with a large 6-ton animal, even if engaging in 'horseplay', is like playing with a bulldozer -- with teeth. Humans, by comparison, are pretty fragile playthings. And we can't hold our breath for very long.



And there's this:

---- snip ----

The same whale has been linked previously to two other deaths. Tilikum and two other whales also were involved in the drowning of a trainer at a Victoria, British Columbia, marine park in 1991. The trainer fell into the whale tank at the Sea Land Marine Park Victoria and was dragged underwater as park visitors watched.

---- snip ----



Now, if you ask me, since this was the first deadly event associated with this whale, I think Tilikum should have been set free. He wasn't.



So now, it's almost 20 years later:

---- snip ----

"While this (recent) incident remains the subject of an ongoing death investigation, there are no signs of foul play," the sheriff's statement said. "All evidence and witness statements indicate that the death was a tragic accident." - Orange County Sheriff's Office



Foul play? No one is suggesting that the trainer was pushed into the water. But I guess they have to worry about lawsuits at this point, given the whale's history, which means human activity has to be ruled out.



Here's the thing: I know I'm supposed to appreciate zoos and aquariums because they're the only way I'd ever see a real lion, or a polar bear, or elephant. But I don't enjoy them. I don't know if animals are truly capable of happiness, but I'm pretty sure they'd prefer to be in their natural habitat without walls or curious onlookers. They may not be safer there, in the wild, but the rest of us would be.



Just saying.



Now, since we're looking for explanations, let's go FULL SPEED AHEAD. Think outside the box. Into the DEEP END (pun intended). Etc. Never mind that we're discussing an animal. Even an animal that has been in captivity for 20 years, is still a wild animal. But let's explore EVERY possible motivation. Ready?



Here we go:

---- snip ----

Tilikum could have been trying to play with Brancheau or get her attention or companionship, said Nancy Black, a marine biologist who has studied whales for 20 years.



But, she noted, the whale could also have been frustrated for some reason.


---- snip ----



Frustrated?

Lonely?

Playful?



Sure. Whatev.

They don't know.



And of course, no story about killer whales is complete without a few hand grenades thrown from PETA:

A spokesman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals called the death "a tragedy that didn't have to happen."



Jaime Zalac said the organization had called on SeaWorld "to stop confining oceangoing mammals to an area that to them is like the size of a bathtub, and we have also been asking the park to stop forcing the animals to perform silly tricks over and over again. It's not surprising when these huge, smart animals lash out."




Got that? It's our own damn fault. No one said that the killer whale was lashing out in frustration. but this will become the narrative. He did it because he was driven insane.



Ooookay.



We may NEVER KNOW for sure WHY the killer whale pulled the woman into the pool. Maybe he was playful. Maybe he was bored with this routine and her ponytail looked interesting. How could anyone tell the difference?



Come PLAY with me!



It's an animal, and despite the fact that we've been studying animal behavior for decades, we know very little about the 'psychology' of mammals.



Final word:

---- snip ----

"They get very stressed out," marine biologist Nancy Black of Monterey Bay Whale Watch said on CNN's "Larry King Live."



"'Neurotic' is the word that we've used, and I sense that that's probably what's happening," he said. "Perhaps that's what drives some of these issues."


---- snip ----



I spoke too soon. 24 hours after her previous statement, NOW she's inclined to suggest that perhaps maybe the whale was neurotic. Because a sane killer whale out in the wild is... LESS dangerous? WTF?



"Probably."

"Perhaps."



These are the words used by people who don't REALLY know. He was, after all, an animal. And I'm not sure how how sane and rational a killer whale is on a GOOD day... inasmuch as those terms could even apply to a whale, regardless of captivity. I'm no expert but I've seen the footage taken that day - just minutes before her death, and he doesn't seem 'neurotic'. No one seemed concerned about his behavior at all.



But, as I said before, this will become the established narrative; he was driven insane by repetition and routine, and lashed out in frustration.



Mark my words.

Mark them.



Exit question:

What should we do with a problematic killer whale that has been in captivity for so long? Set him free? Keep him in captivity, but retire him from entertainment?



Euthanize him?


COMMENTS

-



Morrigon
Morrigon
17:39 Feb 26 2010

It's a fucking orca whale. It KILLS and eats meat. This is not a toy or a piece of entertainment for people. This is a leaving, breathing, unpredictable animal that has every right to be the way it is.



Would any of this happen if people weren't getting into the water with this animal?



I don't like zoos either. I hate the circus. Animals are not here for my entertainment.



To be fair: We're all animals. If they are here for our entertainment, we can only expect them to eventually use us as the same.



They're bigger than us.





Morrigon
Morrigon
17:42 Feb 26 2010

The grand tradition of what we do to animals that are kept in captivity for entertainment or work purposes and then "lash out" is to kill them.



Apparently that is the solution.



WE captured them.



WE bring them to a confined area.



WE make them work for entertainment.



WE put ourselves in "daring" and "Thrilling" situations with these animals.



WE kill them when they "lash out".





Do these people even realize what a creature of this size could do to someone if they were attacking them? You think you have a tamed whale and it decides to play with you. This isn't malicious. This is mankind once again forgetting its mortality and SURPRISE - Dying.





birra
birra
17:50 Feb 26 2010

I stopped the inhumane act of grabbing ducks out of thin air for a bit to commentary:



We see this over and over again.



We really don't need to "understand" these animals, we simply need to understand the facts.



1. It is a WHALE.

2. She is a person.

3. Whales evolved and have existed for hundreds of millions of years in expanses of oceans, underwater.

4. Humans evolved over about a million years, on land.

5. Humans now use whales as entertainment - occassionally, they will turn the tables.



As will any wild animal used as entertainment, and when a 12,000 pound animal decides to take a 150 pound human into their environment, the human isn't going to last long.



SeaWorld makes a LOT of money by using these animals for entertainment. A LOT of money. I'm sure the trainers are paid well and go into these jobs knowing the risks.



I'm not unsympathetic for the trainer or her family, but humans have to stop assuming we can read the minds of animals that have existed here long before us and stop punishing them for being the animals they are when only minutes before we were happy as greedy fat man rolling in a pile of cash watching them dance for us.



You have to take the bad with the good.



And killerwhaletank is one word. Don't these people ever listen to the T-Hip?






ThothLestat
ThothLestat
18:03 Feb 26 2010

But I'm not convinced the whale was "lashing out" or that he was crazy. This isn't quite like Travis the "Stamford Chimp" -- a pet chimpanzee -- who freaked out one day and ripped the face and fingers off a neighbor. Sadly, I think that for a brief moment, Tilikum turned from entertainer into wild animal. For reasons we will never understand.



I think there is a lot of entertainment value associated with trained animals. It's true for horses, lions, and dolphins -- all of which are larger than humans and can be lethal. And yet, I'm willing to make an exception for killer whales. Especially the males, which are often twice the size of females.



The odds are stacked too strongly in their favor.





Isis101
Isis101
21:59 Feb 26 2010

The whales need to be left out in their natural habitat...if anyone wants to see them, they can always take a cruise out to see them, ya' know?



As for the whale Tilikum, he wasn't even suppose to be used in shows...he was suppose to be available for breeding purposes - which is kinda' pathetic in itself.





sahahria
sahahria
22:08 Feb 26 2010

Personally let's just put humans in bathtubs and leave them there for 20 years.



Teach them tricks to do everyday at specific times and then...



Come back 20 years later and then ask them how they feel.



*gets gun ready*





ThothLestat
ThothLestat
22:14 Feb 26 2010

I don't know... free food, lodging, belly rubs, and some recreational breeding... SIGN ME UP!





Sinora
Sinora
14:14 Feb 27 2010

Can't help but think the clue is in the name here...





Joli
Joli
03:32 Mar 05 2010

So long and thanks for all the fish.





 

WHOA. DUDE.

04:54 Feb 26 2010
Times Read: 966


I don't know much about Olympic figure skating, but I think I just saw South Korea kick everyone's asses.



I mean, DAMN.


COMMENTS

-



 

THE DAY THE SAUCERS CAME

18:43 Feb 24 2010
Times Read: 982


The day the saucers came.



But you didn't notice because....


COMMENTS

-



AlexandraAshes
AlexandraAshes
03:20 Feb 25 2010

That was really cool. I love Neil Gaiman, there are other good ones there too.



*thumbs up*





ThothLestat
ThothLestat
03:27 Feb 25 2010

I stumpled on that today.

I think I love him, too.



it's so effin' perfect.





 

BACK ONLINE

14:09 Feb 22 2010
Times Read: 1,008


In my last journal entry, I mentioned that our company had instructed the employees to cease all social-networking during business hours.



Our owners and managers have back-tracked a bit on that policy; namely, they didn't intend for all of us to completely stop communicating online. And they aren't interested in monitoring our internet usage (as it turns out). They wanted to make clear that we are not to discuss our clients publicly, or discuss internal agency matters online. But we are otherwise free to maintain social connections, as long as it doesn't impact our work performance.



So, I am able to be online while I'm at work!

This pleases me.



We now return you to your regularly scheduled program.


COMMENTS

-



birra
birra
14:17 Feb 22 2010

Welcome... back.



So... about that client of yours...





xToxicTemptressx
xToxicTemptressx
14:38 Feb 22 2010

Missed you :)





Morrigon
Morrigon
14:39 Feb 22 2010

Does this mean you have to stop giving all client information to me, including photographs where applicable so I can draw moustaches on them?



:(





Nedra
Nedra
15:40 Feb 22 2010

YEA!





Lolita
Lolita
17:32 Feb 22 2010

YAY.. I was going to suggest packing up your desk and working somewhere else!!!!





Sinora
Sinora
21:05 Feb 22 2010

You'll just have to live without the insider trading money hon lol.





Fizbop
Fizbop
21:27 Feb 22 2010

Welcome back Thoth I missed you





Theban
Theban
11:47 Mar 03 2010

I was just thinking about your stats of course, Tosser!





Joli
Joli
03:36 Mar 05 2010

I love the Thoth Thow!








COMPANY
REQUEST HELP
CONTACT US
SITEMAP
REPORT A BUG
UPDATES
LEGAL
TERMS OF SERVICE
PRIVACY POLICY
DMCA POLICY
REAL VAMPIRES LOVE VAMPIRE RAVE
© 2004 - 2024 Vampire Rave
All Rights Reserved.
Vampire Rave is a member of 
Page generated in 0.0672 seconds.
X
Username:

Password:
I agree to Vampire Rave's Privacy Policy.
I agree to Vampire Rave's Terms of Service.
I agree to Vampire Rave's DMCA Policy.
I agree to Vampire Rave's use of Cookies.
•  SIGN UP •  GET PASSWORD •  GET USERNAME  •
X